GAT: ACTS Telework Chain
Draft Guideline GAT-G1:
Telework: Interoperability Guidelines
Please note that by agreement within the GAT Chain at its June 1997
meeting, Guideline G1 is now being developed on the basis of specific interoperability
topics, of which this GAT-G1a is the first.
Guideline GAT-G1a:
First-Time Interoperability across "Extranets"*:
Developing European Competence and Confidence
This Guideline was drafted and edited by the
European Telework Development Initiative with contributions by ACTS
Telework Chain (GAT) participants and other interested parties, has
been endorsed by the GAT Chain and is now offered for endorsement or comment
by the wider ACTS community. Comments should be sent to etd-gat-g1@eto.org.uk;
earlier comments can be seen on the www at http://www.eto.org.uk/gat/guides/g1-mail
and your comments will be added there. The current version is online at
http://www.eto.org.uk/gat/guid
es/gat-g1.htm.
*Important note:
The term "Extranets" has only come recently into general use and is
subject to different interpretations. In particular it is being applied
in two main ways:
-
Narrowly, meaning a variation of "Intranet" (Internet technologies used
internal-to-an organisation), but with external users allowed access to
company information and services on some kind of mutually agreed but usually
restricted basis;
-
More broadly, meaning the use of the Open Internet by an organisation
or an individual to reach other Internet users for some business-like purpose,
typically by establishing a website, promoting the website and inducing
Internet users to interact online in some way with the organisation.
This Guideline addresses the second, broader perspective, which may
include the narrower one. The significant difference being that at least
initially there is no agreed basis for communication between the parties.
In the global networked economy, effectiveness in this use of the Open
Internet to establish "first contact" with target audiences is critical
to success.
Contents List
Annexures:
First-Time Interoperability across Extranets:
Executive Summary
Extranets represent the purposive use of the Internet by enterprises, individuals
and public services to reach external audiences (eg customers). Successful
exploitation of Extranet methods by enterprises and individuals is central
to Europe's future economic success in the emerging Global Networked Economy.
Succeful use of Extranet methods by public services and in citizen networks
is central to Europe's future social cohesion and to the development of
stronger links across national and other boundaries.
While Intranets assume some commonality of purposes and platforms across
participants, Extranets can make no such assumptions. This leads to significant
but often hidden issues of interoperability, which are as much to do with
market awareness and understanding, coupled with management and operator
decisions, as with technical barriers. Failures of interoperability lead
to lost business opportunities in the case of enterprises, lost work or
social opportunities in the case of citizens, and sub-optimal performance
of public services, with associated cost over-runs.
Success in implementing and using Extranets calls for skills and know-how
that are in very short supply in Europe, which is at a disadvantage compared
with the United States, where there is a much larger critical mass of users,
suppliers and advisers. Relevant market data, particularly about user characteristics,
behaviours and expectations, are also much more readily available in the
largely monocultural market of the USA than in the culturally fragmented
European market. Other leading trade areas, particularly Japan, are accelerating
their adoption of networked economy methods much faster than Europe.
Urgent action is needed to raise European awareness of Interoperability
issues across Extranets, to improve access to relevant information and
competence, and to devise and disseminate best practice approaches and
guides.
Guideline Objectives and Intended Audiences
This Guideline's objective is to highlight the need for special attention
in Europe to interoperability issues relating to Extranets and to recommend
actions. The target audience is policy advisers and decision makers at
European and national levels. Best practice approaches and guides stemming
from this Guideline should be targeted at enterprises, public services
and citizen networks managers.
Discussion and Recommendations
1. Introduction: "first time" connections on the Internet and the World
Wide Web
Growth and prosperity, accompanied by high levels of satisfying and rewarding
employment, are increasingly dependent on understanding and responding
to the emergence of a "global networked economy". Two key factors are:
-
"first time" success in establishing "new connections" across the Internet
with prospective new customers and business partners; and
-
routine success in "transient connections" across the Internet with "one
off" or occasional customers, suppliers etc.
For enterprises, "new connections" means new customers, often in
new markets, or new kinds of connections with existing customers - for
example the shift from meeting customers in High Street shops to meeting
them "online". It also means new suppliers and new kinds of business relationships
- for example a global search for new sources of supply to meet novel market
demands, or participation in a virtual enteprise. It can also mean new
employees and new kinds of employment relationships - for example using
telework to employ people across regional or national boundaries.
For citizens, "new connections" means new work opportunities,
connecting online to potential employers and effectively marketing online
one's experience and competence. It also opens the door to new kinds of
work opportunities - for example in the rise of self-employment, participation
in telework or telecentre networks, portfolio working, virtual enterprise
s
etc. It can also mean access to work opportunities "at a distance" for
those in areas of high unemployment and low economic activity.
For both enterprises and citizens, each "new connection" means
communicating for the first time with another organisation or person, with
whom there has been no prior relationship, and therefore no prior agreement
between the parties about matters such as communications protocols, message
formats and contents, etc.
The "open Internet" enables data networking between people and
organisations without any prior mutual agreement or even any prior contact.
Widespread adoption of Internet protocols means that any user anywhere
can have a high degree of confidence that basic data communications can
be established with any other user. All that is needed is an address for
the other user. The World Wide Web enables individuals and enterprises
to establish an online presence at global level; by establishing a website
any user can present information about themselves in a form that is accessible
by any other user, again without any prior knowledge of the other party.
For all users, successful "transient connections" are essential to achieving
desired results first time and avoiding the adverse cost, productivity
and relationship impacts of failed or unsatisfactory connections.
Use of these technologies is transforming patterns of relationships
across the whole spectrum of social and economic activities. But for every
success there are failures and disappointments. There is an urgent need
to enhance European competence and confidence in the new technologies by
raising the success rate for "first time" and "transient" connections.
In the remainder of this Guideline the term "new connections" is used
for brevity.
2. Extranets: the key to profitable growth in the global networked economy
The Internet is simply a transport mechanism. Electronic mail, discussion
lists, the World Wide Web etc are also simply mechanisms that enable effective
communication across the Internet. Value is only added when these mechanisms
are used successfully for purposive communications. Its convenient to distinguish
between two main environments in which such purposive use occurs:
-
Intranets - where a particular set of users works together for common
purposes and can therefore adopt commonly agreed ways of using the Internet
technologies; and
-
Extranets - where a person or an organisation sets out to connect
with other Internet users but with no commonly agreed approach other than
that each user is connected to and can use the Open Internet
For enterprises (and for individuals working in various kinds of virtual
enterprises), Intranets are a primary mechanism for leveraging costs,
productivity and organisational effectiveness. Extranets are a primary
vehicle for leveraging growth and profitability, since they enable access
to new markets and customers as well as enhanced and more cost effective
services to existing markets and customers.
Considerable attention is already being paid to Intranets, with a proliferation
of consultancy reports, suppliers marketing appropriate added value products
and services, conferences, workshops and seminars etc. Mature supply channels
and organisational infrastructures already exist that can add Intranet
capability to an existing base of in-house systems and networks. Extranets
are more novel, with no experience base. Although there is widespread promotional
activity and media hype, especially surrounding the World Wide Web, there
is relatively little attention to the details and nuances of how to develop
Extranets that will cost-effectively meet well-defined purposes.
3. Issues
Superficially, proliferation of the World Wide Web is a great success story.
In practice, many individual users suffer frustration when they attempt
to access information at websites that are difficult or even impractical
for them to use, while many enterprises suffer disappointments and disillusionment
with their investment in a "web presence" that doesn't deliver the benefits
they anticipated. Users also suffer frustration and disappointment in other
aspects of Extranet use, for example when they receive mail contents that
are encoded in ways they cannot easily unscramble and use; or when they
find potential suppliers or business partners whose approach to an online
presence inhibits an effective dialogue with speedy and satisfactory transactions.
Success in Extranetworking depends on many factors. This guideline focuses
on interoperability across Extranets. Interoperability is the basic
building block without which satisfactory online working cannot occur.
Problems with interoperability inhibit all aspects of online working. In
particular they inhibit early success for enterprises in establishing an
online presence, and early success for individuals in becoming effectively
connected to the global networked economy.
Interoperability has two aspects: technical interoperability,
meaning that the connection works and data can be transferred; and purpose
interoperability, meaning data is transferred in a way that satisfies
the needs of both parties. Both have to be addressed for success in Extranets.
4. Success criteria for first time interoperability
The main success criteria are superficially simple: the "other user" must
be able to:
-
connect with your website or other application readily at any time of their
choosing and without the need for special technology or skills
-
download pages and other contents at a speed that is acceptable relative
to the value as perceived by the user
-
use the contents readily in the context of the relationship you are trying
to create or sustain
-
easily establish alternative connection with you in the event of problems
5. Causes of failure
An important characteristic of the Global Networked Economy is that there
is seldom any strong motivation for the user to overcome barriers in using
a particular website or other online service - there is usually a proliferation
of choices. If the user encounters a barrier he or she is highly likely
to "move on" rather than persevere, even when the barrier is one that the
website or service owner regards as trivial. This underlies the importance
of "right first time" connections and transactions.
Common causes of failure include:
-
the website design assumes a level of Internet performance better than
that available to target users
-
content is made available in "current versions" of applications but the
target user has earlier versions with inadequate backward compatibility
-
inappropriate assumptions are made about target users' technical competence,
application experience, or access to applications
6. Baseline best practice
As a start point for more detailed guidelines on best practice, these basic
rules are suggested:
-
The only successful connection is one that is "right first time"
for the other party you are seeking to connect with;
-
The performance of the link and all the elements must be appropriate
to the task and purpose as seen by the other party and in the context of
the other party's working environment
-
Design and practice should reflect minimum expectations of the other
party's ability to handle even (supposedly) trivial barriers to interoperability.
An immediate conclusion is that:
interoperability across Extranets is as much about market
awareness and managerial choices as it is about technology and technicalities.
7. Developing market-based best practice
Successful exploitation of Extranets will depend on:
-
Understanding the likely systems and networking characteristics of target
audiences for which an Extranet is implemented;
-
Adopting Extranet methods, techniques and practices that are optimised
to the needs of target audiences; and
-
Understanding and responding to the needs of users who may be either more
or less sophisticated than the majority of the target audience concerned.
This approach ("market-based best practice") calls for four main issues
to be addressed:
-
A shortage of reliable data on Internet user characteristics at the level
of market sectors and geographic areas;
-
A shortage of experience and expertise in mapping Extranet interoperability
characteristics against target audience needs and preferences;
-
Lack of best practice exemplars, models and guidelines;
-
Poor awareness and understanding of practical interoperability issues among
managements and technical staffs.
Additionally the rapid evolution of Internet technologies creates a "moving
target" problem. Sophisticated, "leading edge" users rapidly acquire the
latest, most powerful systems and applications and build expectations that
this power and sophistication will be matched by the services and suppliers
they use. Concurrently, the mass market of users "follow the herd", belatedly
adopting whatever achieves market success. And there is always a "tail"
of users who for a variety of reasons lag behind the mainstream. An Extranet
managed by a single company may need to cater for all three types.
Any proposed solutions must therefore be strongly market-based and dynamic,
evolving as the market evolves.
8. European considerations
European individuals and enterprises who seek to implement effective Extranets
face additional interoperability issues:
-
The main language for discussing and disseminating Internet practices is
English. Although English is widely understood throughout Europe it is
for most citizens a second or even a third language. Depending on the purpose,
interoperability across the European markets means either supporting multiple
languages or ensuring that the English used is readily understandable by
non-native speakers.
-
For at least some years to come, Europe will present a patchwork of widely
different levels of Internet access, performance and pricing, and variable
levels of performance from country to country within Europe and across
the EU boundary. European interoperability therefore requires special attention
to the needs of target audiences that have constrained levels of performance
and/or usage constraints based on perceived high connection costs.
-
The dominant force in development of Extranet techniques is currently the
USA. USA-based enterprises work in a homogeneous home market that comprises
more than 50% of the total current global opportunity. From this strong
base they can afford to see the fragmented rest-of-world market (including
Europe) as offering useful additional opportunity. For a European enterprise
the immediate local (national language and culture) market is comparatively
very small and for most European enterprises the global market is conducted
in a foreign language and is rooted in unfamiliar cultural norms, while
the only market already at critical mass (the USA) is one already heavily
occupied by its own home participants. Special efforts are therefore need
ed
to ensure European enterprises fully understand the interoperability requirements
and are able to meet them.
-
USA dominance also skews the available data on user characteristics, behaviour
and expectations, since data collection is mainly USA based, data about
non-USA markets is difficult to disaggregate and the methods used to identify
non-USA user characteristics are generally superficial. Again the European
enterprise starts at a disadvantage.
European enterprises, managers and individuals therefore require considerable
additional help to understand and respond to Extranet interoperability
issues compared with their USA competitors and colleagues.
9. RTD considerations
RTD efforts tend to focus on technical aspects of interoperability - technical
issues of today and technical solutions for tomorrow. But whatever enhancements
emerge from the RTD process, the market will continue to support different
generations of technologies, applications and services. Many users - in
Europe and world wide - will still depend on earlier generation applications
and variable access performance. RTD attention therefore needs to be paid
to:
-
facilities that enable user systems connecting for the first time to readily
detect each others' technology, application and performance characteristics;
-
applications that can "gracefully default" to cope with lower-order or
higher-order connectivity and performance and newer or older versions of
applications (in the same way that modems adapt their speeds and protocols
during initial hand shaking routines)
-
conceiving and delivering "content" approaches that allow for a wide range
of application and connectivity performance rather than being optimised
for a particular level of technologies.
-
enhancing the collection, analysis and reporting of user characteristics.
10. Recommendations
-
Urgent action should be taken to establish regular collection, analysis
and reporting of user characteristics from a European-based Extranet perspective.
This can be done by sampling techniques at a relatively low cost but is
unlikely to be addressed effectively by market forces alone. The data needs
to be collected in a consistent format across Europe.
-
There should be support to the development and dissemination of best practice
approaches and guides. This can perhaps best be achieved through a networks
approach, for example a market-awareness network for Webmasters. An understanding
of the issues and best practice should be incorporated in training related
to the Information Society, the Global Networked Economy and all aspects
of Internet use.
-
Promotional programmes (for example "Best of Web" awards, Telework awards
etc) should include interoperability best practice as a key criterion for
evaluating an online facility or service.
-
Consideration should be given to a "usability audit" of public services
online, with interoperability for the target user as a key criterion.
-
Evidence of good practice and bad practice examples should be collected
and dissseminated.
Roadmap: Detailed Requirements
If the main principles and recommendations are endorsed, a detailed Roadmap
will be developed, proposing specific actions and timings to implement
the recommendations. This will require interaction with wider interests
outside the GAT and ACTS communities. The proposals will need to relate
to relevant aspects of the proposed Fifth Framework Programme and to dovetail
with more general awareness, confidence-building and dissemination activities.
Open Issues
The main "open issues" affecting this Guideline are to do with:
-
The low overall relative development, scale and maturity of Internet use
in Europe, especially relative to the USA, but also in comparison with
other regions, particularly the Pacific Rim economies;
-
Extreme variations in Internet use propensity across different European
member states;
-
Today's limited political awareness within Europe pace of development of
the global networked economy, of the extent and impact of the USA lead
in establishing it, and the consequences of this for future European economic
success and social stability.
State of the Art
See gat-g1aa attached.
Glossary and Supporting References
See gat-g1ab attached.
Return to index of GAT ACTS Telework Chain Guidelines
General information about the GAT ACTS Telework
Chain
This Guideline was last updated: 25 September 1997
Page address of this Guideline: http://www.eto.org.uk/gat/guides/gat-g1.htm
Comments should be sent to etd-gat-g1@eto.org.uk
Web page where current comments may be viewed: http://www.eto.org.uk/gat/guides/g1-mail